Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341778›Full record

ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana

[Updated Detection and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance Recommendations].

Oscar Laudanno, Betiana Pucci, Santiago Brayer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oscar LaudannoInstituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari Universidad de Buenos Aires. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-3292
Betiana PucciInstituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari Universidad de Buenos Aires. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2861-4218
Santiago BrayerInstituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari Universidad de Buenos Aires. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7824-0173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their prevention is based on screening the average risk population (age 50-75, asymptomatic without personal and family history) and the identification of highrisk groups. The vast majority arise from premalignant polyps (adenomas, serrated lesions). Endoscopic polypectomy is effective in reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The adenoma detection rate is the most important quality measure in colonoscopy and is inversely correlated with the risk of interval cancer and mortality. Over the last years, several new technical-quality recommendations and new devices became available to improve polyp's detection and new post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines have been published. The quality and findings of the baseline colonoscopy will determine surveillance intervals. On the other hand, the newest guidelines from the United States recommend colorectal cancer screenings begin at the age of 45 based on new epidemiological data. However, not all countries followed this recommendation. The purpose of this review is to analyze techniques and devices to improve the adenoma detection rate, new post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines, and the age to start and stop colorectal cancer screening. Contextualize data in Argentina and discuss the relevant ongoing research.

Indexed as

adenoma detectionadults-colorectal cancer in ArgentinaColorectal polypsrate-colon cancer youngsurveillance post-polypectomy

Identifiers

PMID41341778
PMCPMC12668450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.