Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341776›Full record

ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana

[Diagnostic Methods for the Detection of

Javier Chahuan, Margarita Pizarro, Arnoldo Riquelme

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Diagnostic Methods for the Detection ofActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Javier ChahuanDepartamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-6200
Margarita PizarroDepartamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-3143
Arnoldo RiquelmeDepartamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8259-8960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric infection by Helicobacter pylori has a variable prevalence worldwide. In Latin America, it can exceed 50% of infected people. It is associated with peptic ulcer, gastric cancer, MALT lymphoma, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, among other pathologies. There is no optimal diagnostic method, and its presence can be detected by both invasive methods that require an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and non-invasive methods. Within the invasive, we have the rapid urease test, histology, molecular tests such as polymerase chain reaction and culture. On the other hand, non-invasive tests include the breath test, Helicobacter pylori antigen in stools, polymerase chain reaction in stools and serology. Depending on the clinical scenario, the diagnostic test to be used, its benefits and weaknesses should be known. It is important to consider the age of the patient, their gastric cancer risk factors, the need for endoscopy for this or another reason, the availability of diagnostic tests and the cost, among others.

Indexed as

diagnosisdiagnostic testsHelicobacter pylori

Identifiers

PMID41341776
PMCPMC12668446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.