ArticleNPJ artificial intelligence2025
Exposure to content written by large language models can reduce stigma around opioid use disorder.
Article in NPJ artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities and risks of large language models in digital interventions for substance use disorders.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Development, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chatbot (Suzy) to Support Patients in Substance Use Disorder Recovery: Multiphase Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Widespread stigma, both offline and online, hinders harm reduction efforts in the context of opioid use disorder (OUD). This stigma targets clinically approved medications for OUD (MOUD), people with the condition, and the condition itself, among several others. Given the potential of artificial intelligence in promoting health equity, this work examines whether large language models (LLMs) can abate stigmatizing attitudes in virtual healthcare communities. To answer this, we conducted a series of randomized controlled experiments, where participants read LLM-generated, human-written, or no responses to help-seeking OUD-related content. The experiment was conducted under two setups: participants read the responses either once (N = 2, 141) or repeatedly for 14 days (N = 107). Participants reported the least stigmatized attitudes toward MOUD after consuming LLM-generated responses. This study offers insights into strategies that can foster inclusive discourse on OUD. Based on our findings LLMs can serve as an education-based intervention to promote positive attitudes and increase people's propensity toward treatments for OUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.