ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Outcomes After Initial Noninterventional Management of Clinical Stage cT1b Renal Masses.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Localized renal masses 4.1-7.0 cm in size (cT1bRMs) are typically treated with partial or radical nephrectomy. Utilization and results of initial nonsurgical approaches for cT1bRMs are unclear. Our primary objective was to evaluate overall (OS) and metastasis-free (MFS) survival after initiating surveillance for cT1bRMs. Methods: We retrospectively examined initial management and subsequent follow-up of all patients diagnosed with cT1bRMs (from May 2017 to November 2024) in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC). Patients were stratified by intervention versus surveillance at 90 d following initial consultation. Patients initiating surveillance were further stratified as those with continued surveillance versus delayed intervention (DI) at least 90 d after initiating surveillance. The 3-yr estimated rates of DI, OS, MFS, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were reported. Key findings and limitations: Of 1134 patients with cT1bRMs, 297 were initiated on surveillance (26%), including 207 (70%) with solid, 47 (16%) with Bosniak III/IV, and 43 (14%) with indeterminate lesions. In a multivariable analysis, the predictors of surveillance included Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 versus 0 (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-2.13), nonsolid tumor type (Bosniak III/IV cyst: OR 8.03, 95% CI 4.58-14; indeterminate: OR 5.42, 95% CI 2.86-10.3), and benign findings on a renal mass biopsy (OR 24.0, 95% CI 9.07-63). For the 297 surveilled cT1bRM patients, the cumulative incidence of DI at 2 yr was 27%, and the rates of MFS, CSS, and OS were, respectively, 91%, 96%, and 84% at 3 yr after initiating surveillance. A subset analysis excluding cystic, indeterminate, and biopsy-proven benign tumors found the cumulative incidence of DI at 2 yr to be 35%, with MFS and OS rates to be 95% and 78%, respectively, at 3 yr. In a multivariable analysis, initial surveillance was not associated with OS (vs immediate treatment; hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% CI 0.83-2.63), with age as the only significant factor (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.48). Limitations include the study's observational and retrospective nature. Conclusions and clinical implications: The MUSIC data support active surveillance for select patients with cT1bRMs. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of surveilling larger (cT1b) renal masses in a large population in Michigan. We found that watching instead of treating cT1b renal masses immediately in older people with more medical conditions did not change survival or cause the cancer to spread compared with people who were treated immediately. We conclude that surveillance for cT1b cancer is an option that should be considered for all patients but implemented selectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.