ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
A Process Evaluation of a Program to Retain Clinical Scientists with Caregiving Responsibilities.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Caregiving responsibilities in academic science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine disproportionately impact early-career faculty, particularly women, exacerbating stress, mental health challenges, and career progression barriers. The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF) launched the Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists to support clinician-scientists facing these challenges, expanding efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai leveraged DDCF funding in 2021 to expand its Distinguished Scholar Award (DSA) program, first launched in 2020. Methods: To enhance faculty support, we convened an interdisciplinary team with expertise in faculty development, integrating tailored programming through collaborative working sessions. In 2022, seven scholars were funded; in 2023, five were awarded. The cohorts represented diverse gender identities, racial and ethnic backgrounds, and research disciplines. Results: Summative evaluations revealed that 83% of respondents found quarterly check-ins with program directors most useful, followed by "Meet the Expert" sessions (67%). Findings highlight the value of structured mentorship and institutional support in fostering research continuity and gender equity. Discussion: Over 2 years, the DSA program provided both financial and professional development support, addressing key challenges faced by junior faculty with caregiving responsibilities. While scholars benefited from mentorship and career development opportunities, participation in additional resources varied, raising questions about how best to balance program structure with flexibility. The ongoing challenge remains on how to equitably support caregivers in science and medicine without adding undue burdens. Our experience underscores the importance of continued dialogue and strategic program refinement to ensure lasting impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.