ArticleObesity pillars2025
Unmasking heterogeneity in metabolic syndrome in a national sample of disaggregated Asian American subgroups.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status and cardiometabolic health among Asian American residents of New York City".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Our previous research has shown that Asian Americans with a body mass index (BMI) above 23 have a higher risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) than non-Hispanic whites of the same BMI. This exploratory study aimed to characterize patterns of metabolic syndrome heterogeneity across Asian American subgroups. Method: This is a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we computed age-adjusted, gender-specific prevalence for MetS and its individual components for three BMI categories among five major Asian American ethnic groups: Chinese (652), Filipino (262), Asian Indian (409), Vietnamese (243), and Korean (215). Results: High MetS prevalence was observed in Asian Americans with a BMI above 23 (overweight or obesity). There were notable variations in MetS prevalence rates across Asian subgroups. Among the five Asian subgroups, excessive MetS risks were observed in Asian Indians, Filipinos, Vietnamese, and Koreans in one or more sex/BMI level categories. In particular, among men who had overweight (BMI 23-27.4), Asian Indians had statistically higher rates of MetS than their Vietnamese counterparts (50.80 % vs. 22.66 %). We also found elevated MetS risks in Asian Indian women who had overweight and Korean women who had obesity (BMI ≥27.5). Conclusion: Our findings highlight an urgent need for further research on cardiometabolic risks and mechanisms driving these risks among disaggregated Asian ethnic groups. Greater understanding of these factors is essential for the development of culturally tailored intervention efforts to reduce MetS disparities among diverse Asian ethnic populations in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.