Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341624›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Network formation and dynamics among multi-LLMs.

Marios Papachristou, Yuan Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marios PapachristouDepartment of Information Systems, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, 400 E Lemon St, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-0729
Yuan YuanGraduate School of Management, UC Davis, 540 Alumni Ln, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networks shape how humans form opinions, exchange information, and organize collectively. As large language models (LLMs) become embedded in social and professional environments, it is critical to understand whether their interactions resemble human network dynamics. We introduce a framework to study the network formation behaviors of multiple LLM agents and benchmark them against human decisions. Across synthetic and real-world settings, including friendship, telecommunication, and employment networks, LLMs reproduce core microlevel principles (preferential attachment, triadic closure, and homophily), and macrolevel properties (community structure, small-world effects). Their emphasis on these principles adapts to context: for example, LLMs favor homophily in friendship networks but heterophily in organizational settings, mirroring patterns of social mobility. A controlled survey shows strong alignment between LLM and human link-formation decisions. These results highlight LLMs' potential as tools for social simulation and synthetic data generation, while underscoring risks of bias and fairness in AI systems that interact with human networks.

Indexed as

agent-based modelinglarge language modelsnetwork formationnetworkssimulations

Identifiers

PMID41341624
PMCPMC12670380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.