ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Network formation and dynamics among multi-LLMs.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI agents can coordinate via majority-following beyond human scale.Science advances · 2026Article
- Social opinions prediction utilizes fusing dynamics equation with LLM-based agents.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social networks shape how humans form opinions, exchange information, and organize collectively. As large language models (LLMs) become embedded in social and professional environments, it is critical to understand whether their interactions resemble human network dynamics. We introduce a framework to study the network formation behaviors of multiple LLM agents and benchmark them against human decisions. Across synthetic and real-world settings, including friendship, telecommunication, and employment networks, LLMs reproduce core microlevel principles (preferential attachment, triadic closure, and homophily), and macrolevel properties (community structure, small-world effects). Their emphasis on these principles adapts to context: for example, LLMs favor homophily in friendship networks but heterophily in organizational settings, mirroring patterns of social mobility. A controlled survey shows strong alignment between LLM and human link-formation decisions. These results highlight LLMs' potential as tools for social simulation and synthetic data generation, while underscoring risks of bias and fairness in AI systems that interact with human networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.