Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341585›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025

Safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases: a systematic review.

Yasmim Dias, Viviane Silva, Maria Fernanda de Carvalho, Rafael Herchenhorn, Daniel Herchenhorn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasmim DiasD'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Viviane SilvaD'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda de CarvalhoInstitute of Medical Education (IDOMED), University Estácio de Sá, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rafael HerchenhornInstitute of Medical Education (IDOMED), University Estácio de Sá, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniel HerchenhornD'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in cancer treatment but may trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), especially in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases (ADs). This population is often excluded from trials due to higher risks of flares, higher rates of irAEs, and potential reduced ICI efficacy. This review examines the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases and explores emerging evidence on potential predictive biomarkers. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed/MEDLINE, searching for articles published from 2015 to 2024 in English. The research combined terms for autoimmune diseases, ICIs (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1/PD-L1), and cancer types, emphasizing studies reporting safety or efficacy outcomes. Due to marked heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, findings were summarized qualitatively rather than quantitative meta-analysis. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251037257). Results: We synthesized recent evidence from 17 studies including 883 cancer patients. with preexisting ADs treated with ICIs. The cohort predominantly included psoriasis (20.5%), rheumatoid arthritis (18%), and inflammatory bowel disease (17.2%) patients. Safety outcomes revealed that 53.5% experienced any-grade irAEs, including 27.5% with newly developed irAEs and 34.3% with autoimmune disease flares. Some patients experienced both irAEs and autoimmune flares concurrently, and 14.9% discontinued treatment due to toxicity (including 5 fatal cases, 0.5%). Treatment efficacy varied substantially, with overall response rates ranging from 11% to 50%, median PFS from 2.9 to 14.4 months, and median OS from 8.2 to 40.5 months. Significant heterogeneity in efficacy outcomes limited comparative analyses. Conclusions: These findings highlight that ICI therapy can be effective in selected patients with well-controlled autoimmune disease, but requires early monitoring, individualized treatment approaches, and multidisciplinary management of patients with coexisting autoimmune disorders.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsHumansTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsautoimmune diseaseCTLA-4efficacyflaresimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmune-related adverse events (irAEs)PD-1safety

Identifiers

PMID41341585
PMCPMC12669149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.