ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Upadacitinib in the treatment of SAPHO syndrome: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Organ Manifestations Beyond the Bone May Guide Risk Stratification and Treatment Decisions in Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Case Report: Sapho syndrome complicated by chest pain successfully treated with relocation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Sepsis: Immune Trajectories, Monocyte Dysfunction, and Translational Biomarkers.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- A combined score based on anterior chest wall CT attenuation to aid recognition of SAPHO syndrome: a training-validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Successful management of refractory SAPHO syndrome with guselkumab-upadacitinib combination.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Successful treatment of SAPHO syndrome refractory to adalimumab with upadacitinib.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome, a rare autoinflammatory disease, is usually defined by musculoskeletal symptoms and cutaneous manifestations. Cutaneous manifestations include palmoplantar pustulosis or severe acne, which are generally accompanied by osteitis and hyperostosis, and are the hallmark of SAPHO syndrome. Genetic, immune, and microbial factors are involved in the pathophysiology of the SAPHO. Small-molecule targeted therapies and biologic agents have transformed the treatment of inflammatory disorders. Upadacitinib, with efficacy in cytokine-related disorders, represents a therapeutic candidate for SAPHO syndrome. Here we report a patient with a 20-year history of pustular palmoplantar psoriasis (PPP) who developed progressive inflammatory arthralgia over the past decade. Radiographic and scintigraphic evaluations showed distinct sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis and osteitis, confirming a diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome. Conventional therapies, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and topical agents, failed to improve cutaneous or articular symptoms. After ineffective treatment with secukinumab (an IL-17A inhibitor), transitioning to upadacitinib (a selective JAK1 inhibitor) improved pustular lesions and reduced joint pain and inflammation, demonstrating clinical improvement. This case illustrates the effectiveness of upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, for the rapid resolution of cutaneous and articular symptoms of SAPHO syndrome following unsuccessful IL-17A inhibition, offering valuable insights for management of refractory SAPHO syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.