ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025
Bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession versus unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection: a 12-month outcome analysis for intermittent exotropia.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is a common form of strabismus, often treated surgically to improve ocular alignment and binocular vision. This study compares the outcomes of two surgical techniques: bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRR) and unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus muscle resection (ULRRMMR), focusing on sensory eye alignment, stereopsis function, and binocular vision recovery. Methods: This retrospective study included 306 children with intermittent exotropia, assigned to either the BLRR or ULRRMMR group. Participants were evaluated preoperatively and at 1-, 3-, and 12-months post-surgery for sensory alignment, stereopsis, binocular vision, and complications. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Results: After surgery at one day, overcorrection was observed more frequently in the BLRR group (P = 0.02). A comparison of the two surgical approaches revealed that the BLRR group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in sensory eye alignment (P = 0.009). In contrast, the ULRRMMR group showed superior outcomes in terms of foveal stereopsis (P = 0.01), binocular vision recovery (P = 0.007), and achieving normal eye alignment (P < 0.001) at 12 months. Notably, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications or binocular vision recovery between the two groups at the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.822). Conclusion: Both BLRR and ULRRMMR are effective treatments for intermittent exotropia, but the BLRR may be a more optimal choice for enhancing sensory alignment, while ULRRMMR technique offers superior recovery in terms of stereopsis, and binocular vision recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.