ArticleBrain communications2025
Consensus on covert awareness: a Delphi study.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying wilful brain activity in patients with disorders of consciousness is critical, as some patients fail to exhibit behavioural signs of consciousness at the bedside but respond to active tasks via neuroimaging or electrophysiological measures. Standardized terminology for this subgroup is absent while it is essential for advancing research and clinical care. The objective of this study was to determine the level of consensus among a large group of international experts on terminology and definitions for this clinical entity, as described by terms such as covert awareness, cognitive motor dissociation, functional locked-in syndrome, and non-behavioural minimally conscious state. A Delphi study was conducted using REDCap to evaluate expert agreement on terminology and definitions. The study was conducted among international experts, primarily from Europe/UK, the USA and other regions. Ninety-six experts participated. Among these, 75 (78%) completed both rounds. Participants were predominantly clinical scientists (71%) working in rehabilitation settings (63%). A Delphi method was followed. Consensus on terminology and related definitions was defined as a median score of 5, an interquartile range ≤1 and ≥75% agreement (scores of 4 or 5). Within two rounds, consensus was achieved for over two-thirds of the statements. The term 'Covert Awareness' and its associated definition were identified as the preferred terminology by an international expert panel. We recommend the use of 'Covert Awareness' since our large group of international experts consistently agreed on such preferred term for this subgroup of patients with disorders of consciousness. This consensus (>75% agreement) establishes a foundation both for future research and clinical standardization. The findings have implications for improving diagnostic accuracy and advancing understanding of covert awareness, although further study is needed to refine and apply the agreed-upon definition in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.