ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Clinical Criteria to Guide Antineuronal Antibody Testing for People With Early and Persistent Psychosis Attending Mental Health Services.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Efforts Toward Evidence-Based Laboratory Testing of Antineuronal Antibodies in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early detection of autoimmune psychosis (AP) mediated by antineuronal antibodies (Abs) is critical for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. However, evidence remains limited regarding who should be tested and how Ab-positive cases should be managed. In this large-scale study, we evaluated proposed clinical criteria for targeted Ab testing in psychiatric services and described the clinical course of seropositive patients. Methods: Individuals with early psychosis (EP) or persistent psychosis (PP) were prospectively assessed with clinical criteria to determine high- or low-risk status for AP. Blood samples were collected for Ab testing using a fixed cell-based assay. Seropositive individuals were invited for detailed review, including clinical, functional, and cognitive assessments at baseline and a 12-month follow-up. Blood samples were collected from 754 individuals (EP: Results: Abs were present in 2.3% (17/754), including 3.4% (12/352) of patients with EP and 1.2% (5/402) of patients with PP. AP was confirmed in 2 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-positive high-risk individuals (total: 2/754, 0.3%; EP: 1/352, 0.3%; PP: 1/402, 0.2%). Both improved with immunotherapy. Although some low-risk patients were seropositive, none were diagnosed clinically with AP. Conclusions: AP prevalence was low in this cohort. Targeted testing informed by clinical high-risk criteria successfully identified 2 immunotherapy-responsive AP cases. This approach appears feasible but requires further validation. People with psychosis and high-risk AP features should be considered for Ab testing in sera and CSF where indicated. Further research is required to embed targeted Ab testing into mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.