ArticleJournal of machine learning research : JMLR2025
Efficient and Robust Semi-supervised Estimation of Average Treatment Effect with Partially Annotated Treatment and Response.
Article in Journal of machine learning research : JMLR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antidiabetic Drug Associations With Heart Failure Outcomes: Real-World Evidence Study Using Electronic Health Records.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Advancing the Use of Longitudinal Electronic Health Records: Tutorial for Uncovering Real-World Evidence in Chronic Disease Outcomes.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Generate Analysis-Ready Data for Real-world Evidence: Tutorial for Harnessing Electronic Health Records With Advanced Informatic Technologies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A notable challenge of leveraging Electronic Health Records (EHR) for treatment effect assessment is the lack of precise information on important clinical variables, including the treatment received and the response. Both treatment information and response cannot be accurately captured by readily available EHR features in many studies and require labor-intensive manual chart review to precisely annotate, which limits the number of available gold standard labels on these key variables. We considered average treatment effect (ATE) estimation when 1) exact treatment and outcome variables are only observed together in a small labeled subset and 2) noisy surrogates of treatment and outcome, such as relevant prescription and diagnosis codes, along with potential confounders are observed for all subjects. We derived the efficient influence function for ATE and used it to construct a semi-supervised multiple machine learning (SMMAL) estimator. We justified that our SMMAL ATE estimator is semi-parametric efficient with B-spline regression under low-dimensional smooth models. We developed the adaptive sparsity/model doubly robust estimation under high-dimensional logistic propensity score and outcome regression models. Results from simulation studies demonstrated the validity of our SMMAL method and its superiority over supervised and unsupervised benchmarks. We applied SMMAL to the assessment of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer in comparison to chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41341524PMC12671556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.