ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Combined MRI morphometry and source imaging guide placement of stereo-EEG electrodes in focal epilepsy with subtle or absent lesions.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of volume- and surface-based magnetic resonance imaging morphometry algorithms in the detection of focal cortical dysplasia.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Sleep magnetoencephalography enhances detection and source imaging of seizures and fast oscillations in focal cortical dysplasia.Epilepsia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Planning stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) for focal drug-resistant epilepsy with subtle or absent lesions requires accurate non-invasive spatial information about the hypothetical organization of the epileptic focus. The targeting of individual trajectories for a limited number of invasive depth electrodes is particularly challenging in patients who have undergone prior epilepsy surgery. This study investigated how information from multimodal imaging can guide sEEG planning and enable successful epilepsy surgery in patients with non-lesional focal epilepsy. Methods: We studied 15 patients who appeared non-lesional on conventional MRI and were suspected to have mono-focal epilepsy. These patients underwent sEEG implantation between October 2019 and October 2022, based on findings from non-invasive video-EEG monitoring and multimodal imaging. Among the participants, four had undergone prior epilepsy surgery, including three who had previously undergone invasive EEG. All patients underwent high-resolution 3 T MRI and MRI morphometry (MAP) as part of their non-invasive presurgical diagnostics. Electric and magnetic source imaging were performed in patient subgroups. sEEG planning incorporated findings from the available imaging methods registered within the stereotactic planning system. Results: A median of nine sEEG electrodes (range: 7-11) were implanted in each patient, targeting both primary and secondary hypotheses about the epileptic focus location. sEEG recordings revealed a monofocal seizure onset in 12 out of 15 patients, all of whom subsequently underwent epilepsy surgery. No bleeding complications occurred. Of these patients, nine achieved Engel 1 postsurgical outcomes, while three had Engel ≥2 outcomes. Surgery was not performed in three patients due to multifocal epilepsy (n = 2) or an unidentified seizure onset zone (SOZ, n = 1). Concordance across multiple imaging modalities was associated with favorable surgical outcomes. Conclusion: In patients with focal epilepsy and subtle or absent lesions, sophisticated sEEG diagnostics guided by advanced multimodal imaging can successfully identify the seizure onset zone. When focal onset is confirmed and multifocal epilepsy is excluded through sEEG, subsequent epilepsy surgery often results in seizure-free outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.