ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025
Multivariate meta-analysis with a robustified diagonal likelihood function.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multivariate meta-analysis is an efficient tool to analyze multivariate outcomes from independent studies, with the advantage of accounting for correlations between these outcomes. However, existing methods are sensitive to outliers in the data. In this paper, we propose new robust estimation methods for multivariate meta-analysis. In practice, within-study correlations are frequently not reported in studies, conventional robust multivariate methods using modified estimation equations may not be applicable. To address this challenge, we utilize robust functions to create new log-likelihood functions, by only using the diagonal components of the full covariance matrices. This approach bypasses the need for within-study correlations and also avoids the singularity problem of covariance matrices in the computation. Furthermore, the asymptotic distributions can automatically account for the missing correlations between multiple outcomes, enabling valid confidence intervals on functions of parameter estimates. Simulation studies and two real-data analyses are also carried out to demonstrate the advantages of our new robust estimation methods. Our primary focus is on bivariate meta-analysis, although the approaches can be applied more generally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.