Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341456›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Multivariate meta-analysis with a robustified diagonal likelihood function.

Zongliang Hu, Qianyu Zhou, Guanfu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zongliang HuSchool of Mathematical Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Qianyu ZhouSchool of Mathematical Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Guanfu LiuSchool of Statistics and Information, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate meta-analysis is an efficient tool to analyze multivariate outcomes from independent studies, with the advantage of accounting for correlations between these outcomes. However, existing methods are sensitive to outliers in the data. In this paper, we propose new robust estimation methods for multivariate meta-analysis. In practice, within-study correlations are frequently not reported in studies, conventional robust multivariate methods using modified estimation equations may not be applicable. To address this challenge, we utilize robust functions to create new log-likelihood functions, by only using the diagonal components of the full covariance matrices. This approach bypasses the need for within-study correlations and also avoids the singularity problem of covariance matrices in the computation. Furthermore, the asymptotic distributions can automatically account for the missing correlations between multiple outcomes, enabling valid confidence intervals on functions of parameter estimates. Simulation studies and two real-data analyses are also carried out to demonstrate the advantages of our new robust estimation methods. Our primary focus is on bivariate meta-analysis, although the approaches can be applied more generally.

Indexed as

62H12Correlationsdiagonal likelihoodmultivariate meta-analysisoutlierrobust estimation

Identifiers

PMID41341456
PMCPMC12671434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.