ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025
New strategies for detecting atypical observations based on the information matrix equality.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic analyses in regression modeling are usually based on residuals or local influence measures and are used for detecting atypical observations. We develop a new approach for identifying such observations when the parameters of the model are estimated by maximum likelihood. The proposed approach is based on the information matrix equality, which holds when the model is correctly specified. We introduce a new definition of an atypical observation: one that disproportionately affects the degree of adequate specification of the model as measured using the sample counterparts of the matrices that comprise the information matrix equality. We consider various measures of distance between two symmetric matrices and apply them such that a zero distance indicates correct model specification. These measures quantify the degree of model adequacy and help identify atypical cases that significantly impact the model's adequacy. We also introduce a modified generalized Cook distance and a new criterion that uses the two generalized Cook's distances (modified and unmodified). Empirical applications involving Gaussian and beta regression models are presented and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.