Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The personal roles dimension of the theory of work and personal role reconciliation: a constructivist grounded theory study.

Miguel Valencia-Contrera, Lissette Avilés, Naldy Febré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel Valencia-ContreraFaculty of Nursing, Andrés Bello University, Santiago, Chile.
Lissette AvilésNursing Studies Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Naldy FebréFaculty of Nursing, Andrés Bello University, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the theory of work and personal role reconciliation has been recently published, the personal roles dimension has not yet been explored in depth. This article aims to describe its theorization. Methods: Constructivist grounded theory was employed to conceptualize the phenomenon of interest from the perspectives of nurses, their families, and administrative staff. Data were derived from 202 h of non-participant observation in two high-complexity hospitals in Chile (one public and one private), 57 institutional documents, and 51 in-depth interviews. Data analysis followed the constant comparative method and multilevel coding. To ensure methodological rigor, the study adhered to the 13 criteria for constructivist grounded theory research proposed by Charmaz and Thornberg and was approved by a Scientific Ethics Committee. Results: Personal roles are defined as the set of behaviors associated with the personal context of intensive care unit nurses, which are shaped by eight sources of interaction: (1) Family dimension; (2) Extended family; (3) Community groups; (4) Recreation spaces; (5) Religious institutions; (6) Health care institutions; (7) Educational institutions; and (8) Other public services. Conclusion: The study presents the theorization process of the personal dimension involved in the reconciliation of work and personal roles among nurses in Intensive Care Units. Personal roles are essential to understanding this reconciliation process. The findings provide evidence of the existence of eight sources of interaction, which are influenced by the cultural context.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalAdultChileFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Researchgrounded theoryintensive care unitsnursingqualitative researchwork-life balance

Identifiers

PMID41341435
PMCPMC12671553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.