ArticleEmergency medicine international2025
Normative Laboratory Value Ranges in Pediatric Patients Who Underwent Evaluation for MIS-C.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is challenging due to symptom overlap with other common conditions. The primary objective of this multicenter study was to establish normative laboratory values in MIS-C patients and compare to patients evaluated for MIS-C who had other final diagnoses. Methods: Five hospitals reviewed records of a cohort of patients 6 months to 18 years old who were evaluated for MIS-C between March 31 Results: Of the 1319 patients that were evaluated for MIS-C at presentation, 293 (22.2%) received a final diagnosis of MIS-C. MIS-C patients had statistically significant differences in laboratory values including D-dimer, ferritin, fibrinogen, troponin, and brain natriuretic peptide when compared to patients evaluated for MIS-C but subsequently diagnosed with other conditions. The most common non-MIS-C diagnoses within this cohort were viral illnesses (26.7%), acute COVID-19 (12.0%), pyelonephritis (6.4%), fever of unknown origin (4.9%), pneumonia (4.7%), gastroenteritis (4.7%), Kawasaki disease (3.7%), other bacterial infections, (3.1%), rheumatologic conditions (3.1%), and sepsis (2.8%). Conclusions: Many patients who underwent laboratory evaluation for MIS-C during the COVID-19 pandemic received a final diagnosis other than MIS-C. These data may aid pediatricians in differentiating between MIS-C and other febrile conditions as well as reduce unnecessary testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.