Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341405›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

GIMEMA survey on the management of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the third line and beyond: insights from Italian hematologists.

Massimo Breccia, Alfonso Piciocchi, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Daniela Cilloni, Fausto Castagnetti, Monica Messina, Stefano Soddu, Barbara Scappini, Uros Markovic, Mario Annunziata and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Massimo BrecciaDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Alfonso PiciocchiGruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta AbruzzeseUnità Operativa Complessa U.O.C. Ematologia, Ospedale S. Eugenio, Rome, Italy.
Daniela CilloniEmatologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy.
Fausto CastagnettiHematology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Monica MessinaGruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Stefano SodduGruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Barbara ScappiniStruttura Ospedaliera Dipartimentale Ematologia, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Uros MarkovicDivision of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico -San Marco, Catania, Italy.
Mario AnnunziataOspedale Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy.
Alessandra MalatoA.O. Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello-P.O. Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
Gianni BinottoUnit of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Olga MulasAzienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Presidio Ospedaliero A. Businco, Struttura Complessa Ematologia E CTMO, Cagliari, Italy.
Massimiliano BonifacioSection of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paola FaziGruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio PaneUnità Operativa Complessa Ematologia, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately one-third of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients may develop resistance and/or intolerance to the current therapies and need to switch to later lines of treatment. However, how to choose a later line of therapy is still a matter of discussion. Methods: A survey was performed by the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) to understand how the scenario has changed after the introduction of the first allosteric inhibitor, asciminib, in later lines. Results: The GIMEMA survey aimed to reassess the Italian approach to third-line or later-line treatments in CML. In the whole cohort of 1,637 patients, to treat resistance, ponatinib was used with a mean of 41% [standard deviation (SD) = 29] and a median of 50% (0-100), while asciminib was used with a mean of 27% (SD = 23) and a median of 25% (0-100). Indeed, to treat intolerance, asciminib was the most used with a mean of 32% (SD = 30) and a median of 30 (0-100), followed by bosutinib with a mean of 25% (SD = 25) and a median of 20 (0-90). Several possible treatment sequences were analyzed, and asciminib emerged as the best third-line treatment. Conclusions: The survey attempted to understand the major reasons for treatment switch, how tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were selected, and which drug was preferred based on patient and disease characteristics. The current algorithm of treatment seems to have changed in both resistant and intolerant CML patients in later lines. The reduction of TKI dose is a current practice to maintain efficacy while reducing the occurrence of side effects.

Indexed as

asciminibchronic myeloid leukemialater linesprognosistyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41341405
PMCPMC12668961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.