Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341396›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

The colonic flap: a versatile and reliable donor-site-free technique for pelvic reconstruction after exenteration.

Chucheep Sahakitrungruang, Songphol Malakorn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chucheep SahakitrungruangChulalongkorn Colorectal Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Songphol MalakornChulalongkorn Colorectal Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent malignancies results in a large pelvic dead space and complex perineal defects, presenting formidable reconstructive challenges. Conventional methods, such as the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap, are effective but associated with significant donor-site morbidity and flap-specific complications. To overcome these limitations, the colonic flap was developed, a technique that utilizes a vascularized segment of sigmoid colon harvested within the operative field. This approach has two main applications: a mucosa-intact sigmoid flap for neovaginal reconstruction, and a mucosa-removed colonic flap for pelvic floor reconstruction and dead-space obliteration. This review outlines the limitations of existing techniques, the rationale for the colonic flap, its surgical principles, indications, clinical outcomes, and limitations. Based on more than a decade of clinical experience, the colonic flap has proven to be a safe, versatile, and effective reconstructive option. It avoids donor-site morbidity, is fully compatible with minimally invasive surgery, and provides excellent functional and oncologic outcomes. The colonic flap should be considered a valuable addition to reconstructive options in advanced pelvic surgery.

Indexed as

colonic flapminimally invasive surgerymucosa-removed flapneovaginapelvic exenterationpelvic reconstructionrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41341396
PMCPMC12668939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.