ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
The colonic flap: a versatile and reliable donor-site-free technique for pelvic reconstruction after exenteration.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent malignancies results in a large pelvic dead space and complex perineal defects, presenting formidable reconstructive challenges. Conventional methods, such as the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap, are effective but associated with significant donor-site morbidity and flap-specific complications. To overcome these limitations, the colonic flap was developed, a technique that utilizes a vascularized segment of sigmoid colon harvested within the operative field. This approach has two main applications: a mucosa-intact sigmoid flap for neovaginal reconstruction, and a mucosa-removed colonic flap for pelvic floor reconstruction and dead-space obliteration. This review outlines the limitations of existing techniques, the rationale for the colonic flap, its surgical principles, indications, clinical outcomes, and limitations. Based on more than a decade of clinical experience, the colonic flap has proven to be a safe, versatile, and effective reconstructive option. It avoids donor-site morbidity, is fully compatible with minimally invasive surgery, and provides excellent functional and oncologic outcomes. The colonic flap should be considered a valuable addition to reconstructive options in advanced pelvic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.