ArticleJMIR neurotechnology2024
Assessing the Role of the Autonomic Nervous System as a Driver of Sleep Quality in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Observation Study.
Article in JMIR neurotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low sleep quality is a common symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) and substantially decreases patients' quality of life. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is crucial to healthy sleep, and the transition from wake to sleep produces the largest shift in autonomic activity we experience every day. For patients with MS, the ANS is often impaired. The relationship between the ANS and perceived sleep quality in patients with MS remains elusive. Objective: In this study, we aim to quantify the impact of the ANS and MS on perceived sleep quality. Methods: We monitored 77 participants over 2 weeks using an arm-worn wearable sensor and a custom smartphone app. Besides recording daily perceived sleep quality, we continuously recorded participants' heart rate (HR) and HR variability on a per-second basis, as well as stress, activity, and the weather (20,700 hours of sensor data). Results: During sleep, we found that reduced HR variability and increased motion led to lower perceived sleep quality in patients with MS (n=53) as well as the age- and gender-matched control group (n=24). An activated stress response (high sympathetic activity and low parasympathetic activity) while asleep resulted in lower perceived sleep quality. For patients with MS, an activated stress response while asleep reduced perceived sleep quality more heavily than in the control group. Similarly, the effect of increased stress levels throughout the day is particularly severe for patients with MS. For patients with MS, we found that stress correlated negatively with minimal observed HR while asleep and might even affect their daily routine. We found that patients with MS with more severe impairments generally recorded lower perceived sleep quality than patients with MS with less severe disease progression. Conclusions: For patients with MS, stress throughout the day and an activated stress response while asleep play a crucial role in determining sleep quality, whereas this is less important for healthy individuals. Besides ensuring an adequate sleep duration, patients with MS might thus work to reduce stressors, which seem to have a particularly negative effect on sleep quality. Generally, however, sleep quality decreases with MS disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.