ArticleInterventional pain medicine2025
Rates of lumbar vertebral body compression fracture after basivertebral nerve ablation: A retrospective study utilizing a large national database.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vertebrogenic Low Back Pain and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation: A Review of Mechanisms, Imaging-Driven Selection, and Clinical Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) is an effective treatment for vertebrogenic chronic low back pain. However, data regarding rates of post-BVNA lumbar vertebral compression fracture (VCF), particularly among patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia, remains limited. Objective: (1) Estimate the rate of lumbar VCF after BVNA. (2) Compare rates between patients with and without a pre-BVNA diagnosis of osteopenia/osteoporosis utilizing a large global database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using TriNetX, a national database of de-identified health records from over 130 million patients. Adults (≥18 years) who underwent BVNA between January 2022 and August 2025 were identified via CPT code. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of ICD-10 code for osteoporosis/osteopenia before undergoing BVNA. The primary outcome was incidence of ICD-10 code diagnosis of lumbar VCF after undergoing BVNA. Results: A total of 2387 patients underwent BVNA (mean age 63.7 years; 48.0 % female). Of these, 669 had a pre-BVNA diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia (mean age 70.2 ± 10.7 years; 64.4 % female). Lumbar VCF occurred in 37 patients (1.55 %; 95 % CI, 1.11-2.16 %) after BVNA. Patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia had higher rate of post-BVNA lumbar VCF compared to those without (4.64 % vs 0.37 %), though rates of post-BVNA lumbar VCF were overall low across all patients (1.55 %). Osteoporosis/osteopenia was independently associated with post-BVNA VCF (adjusted OR 6.5; 95 % CI, 3.7-12.3; p < 0.001). Conclusion: While patients with pre-BVNA ICD-10 code diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia had higher rates and were at higher risk of post-BVNA VCF than those without, overall rates were still low. Risk of VCF should be considered and risks/benefits should be discussed with patients, but a diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia should not be considered an absolute contraindication to BVNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.