Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2025
Effect of Sandblasting Process on 3D Printed Intervertebral Cage.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Research Progress in the Abrasive Machining and Finishing of Additively Manufactured Metal Parts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To meet the growing requirement of spinal interbody fusion caused by trauma and disease, 3D printed porous titanium alloy scaffolds were applied as intervertebral cages to achieve structural reconstruction of bone defects. However, the biological inert of the titanium alloy hindered firm bonding between the bone and porous scaffold. Surface roughness that resulted from sandblasting treatment with alumina sand grains could endow the titanium alloy scaffold with bioactivity. Minimum and maximum-type cervical and posterior lumbar cages were used to optimize the sandblasting process, achieving an adequate and uniform sandblasting effect. The optimized sandblasting process parameters were as follows: alumina sand grains of 100 mesh, sandblasting distance of 10 cm, sandblasting pressure of 0.4-0.5 MPa, and sandblasting time of 15-20 s.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.