ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Higher screw-to-cage length ratios in standalone lateral interbody fusion using integrated, expandable implants provide more predictable outcomes with less variability: A 2-year follow-up study.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Context: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) is widely used for degenerative spinal disorders. Standalone LLIF with expandable cages integrating plate-screw fixation (eLLIFp) has emerged to address disc degeneration and adjacent segment disease while reducing the need for posterior fixation. Biomechanical data suggest greater stability with longer screws, but the clinical impact of screw-to-cage length ratios remains unclear. This study evaluates outcomes following eLLIFp and investigates whether screw-to-cage ratios influence results. Methods: Eighty-one patients (87 levels) underwent eLLIFp, mean age 63.8±10.8 years (49.4% female), BMI 27.7±4.9 kg/m². Common levels treated were L2/3 (35%) and L3/4 (29%). Mean retractor time was 30.2±5.5 min. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data examined integrated screw length (30-60 mm) and cage length (50-65 mm). Screw-to-cage ratios were grouped into tertiles: Low (0.46-0.75, n=36), Medium (0.76-0.82, n=18), and High (0.83-1.0, n=27). Outcomes included pain (VAS), disability (ODI), quality of life (SF-12), and fusion status on 12-month CT. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results: At 12 months, all patients showed significant improvement (p<0.0001) [VAS back: 7.6→0.9; VAS leg: 6.3→0.7; ODI: 25.7→5.1; SF-12 PCS: 29.9→49.2; MCS: 37.3→55.6]. Improvements were comparable across tertiles, though the high-ratio group exhibited less variability in leg pain outcomes. Fusion was achieved in 79/81 (97.5%) patients. Complications occurred in 5 (6.2%): 3 neurological (motor radiculopathy, radicular pain, transient thigh numbness) and 2 symptomatic nonunions requiring posterior fixation, both with lower screw-to-cage ratios (0.7). Conclusions: Higher screw-to-cage ratios (0.83-1.0) in standalone eLLIFp constructs may enhance consistency in leg pain relief without increasing complications. Maximizing screw length relative to cage dimensions may optimize outcomes and reduce variability in standalone LLIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.