Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340979›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025

Giant coronary artery aneurysms: a case series and management recommendations.

Arja Suzanne Vink, Maik J D Grundeken, Bart Straver, Danielle Robbers-Visser, Berto J Bouma, Dave R Koolbergen, Robbert J De Winter, Marcel A M Beijk

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arja Suzanne VinkDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-7967
Maik J D GrundekenDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-8556
Bart StraverDepartment of Cardiology, Center for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden (CAHAL), Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Danielle Robbers-VisserDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Berto J BoumaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Dave R KoolbergenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Center for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden (CAHAL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZG, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-5716
Robbert J De WinterDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Marcel A M BeijkDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Room G2-207, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are a rare clinical entity, and little is known about their natural history, prognosis, and management. Invasive management of patients with CAA is challenging not only because of this limited understanding but also due to the technical challenges associated with both percutaneous and surgical interventions. Case summary: We describe the management of seven cases with giant CAAs in an elective setting. Our first case demonstrates successful percutaneous closure of a giant right coronary aneurysm in an asymptomatic patient using an Amplatzer™ Vascular Plug. In four cases, surgery was performed, due to the presence of symptoms and/or when revascularization by a percutaneous intervention was considered to be unsuitable. Two cases were managed conservatively due to the patients' advanced age and significant comorbidities. Discussion: Although most published cases of giant CAAs involve elective surgical treatment, growing expertise shows that percutaneous intervention is a viable and increasingly promising alternative-particularly in younger patients or those at high surgical risk. Based on the limited available evidence and our own experience, we propose a practical management algorithm to help guide multidisciplinary decision-making. This emphasizes that percutaneous treatment should be actively considered as part of a tailored, patient-specific strategy in the management of giant CAAs.

Indexed as

Case reportCoronary artery aneurysm (CAA)Coronary artery bypass graftingCoronary artery ectasia (CAE)Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Identifiers

PMID41340979
PMCPMC12671400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.