ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Giant coronary artery aneurysms: a case series and management recommendations.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant Coronary Artery Aneurysm Arising From a Septal Perforator: Diagnosis and Percutaneous Management.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Multiple Coronary Artery Aneurysms and Coronary-Pulmonary Artery Fistula Associated with Vieussens' Arterial Ring.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are a rare clinical entity, and little is known about their natural history, prognosis, and management. Invasive management of patients with CAA is challenging not only because of this limited understanding but also due to the technical challenges associated with both percutaneous and surgical interventions. Case summary: We describe the management of seven cases with giant CAAs in an elective setting. Our first case demonstrates successful percutaneous closure of a giant right coronary aneurysm in an asymptomatic patient using an Amplatzer™ Vascular Plug. In four cases, surgery was performed, due to the presence of symptoms and/or when revascularization by a percutaneous intervention was considered to be unsuitable. Two cases were managed conservatively due to the patients' advanced age and significant comorbidities. Discussion: Although most published cases of giant CAAs involve elective surgical treatment, growing expertise shows that percutaneous intervention is a viable and increasingly promising alternative-particularly in younger patients or those at high surgical risk. Based on the limited available evidence and our own experience, we propose a practical management algorithm to help guide multidisciplinary decision-making. This emphasizes that percutaneous treatment should be actively considered as part of a tailored, patient-specific strategy in the management of giant CAAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.