ReviewCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence in Acute Neuroimaging Pathways: Diagnostic Accuracy, Workflow Performance, and Clinical Outcomes Across CT and MRI in Stroke and Trauma.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes current evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) applied to emergency neuroimaging for stroke and traumatic brain injury. Across diverse settings, most work focuses on CT-based tools that assist with detection, scoring, triage, and outcome prediction, with MRI used less often for complementary tasks. Findings generally suggest improved diagnostic support and early signals of workflow benefit, though study designs and reporting are heterogeneous. Overall, AI appears ready to augment acute care when integrated into decision pathways, but broader, practice-oriented evaluations with attention to robustness, equity, and real-world implementation remain necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.