ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
[Growth of Children with Neonatal Short Bowel Syndrome: Its Relationship to Gestational Age].
Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It has been described that children with chronic intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome have an impact on growth. Objective: To compare the growth of children with chronic intestinal failure secondary to neonatal short bowel syndrome between newborns of gestational age ≥ 36 weeks and 6 days Group 1 and < 36 weeks Group 2, evaluated at two years of age and during childhood. Methods: Longitudinal, retrospective, analytical study of children with neonatal short bowel syndrome and chronic intestinal failure. Growth, weight/age z-score, height/age z-score and body mass index/age z-score (World Health Organization) were determined at 2 years of age; a posteriori, we analyzed the beginning and end of a period of one year between 2-9 years of age of the same patients. Results: Group 1: 13 patients, Group 2: 8 patients. A greater impact on height/age z-score was found in Group 2 at 2 years (p < 0.008). During the analyzed period after 2 years, it was observed that the weight/age z-score and the body mass index z-score/age remained stable, while the height/ age z-score worsened in both groups. Conclusion: Children with < 36-weeks of gestational age had a greater impact on longitudinal growth at 2 years and both groups studied had a negative impact on height growth after 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.