ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Efficacy of a bacterial bedding conditioner in the reduction of footpad lesions in broilers.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Footpad dermatitis is a multifactorial condition that affects broiler welfare. We aimed to evaluate whether a bacterial compound sprinkled on the litter could have a positive effect on the formation of footpad lesions (FPL), a trial was conducted under productive conditions. A total of 89,200 Ross308 chickens (39 ± 3 g) were housed in two sheds (C, control; T, treated). Females were housed in the first part of each shed, and males in the second and third part. A bacterial bedding conditioner was applied in T, while no treatments were carried out in C. Females were slaughtered at 36d (T: 1528 ± 195 g; C: 1562 ± 188 g) and males utilized the whole space until 43d (T: 2696 ± 296 g; C: 2737 ± 364 g). At 20d and before capture, 30 birds living in each part of the shed were randomly selected and, from both pads, the perimeter shape of each lesion was recorded, and the FPL area was measured. Litter was sampled at the same timepoints, for bacteriological and mycological culture, and chemical analysis. At slaughtering, 12 legs for females and 12 for males, both C and T, were randomly selected for histological examination. At day 20, FPL were not observed in birds. At 36 days, lesions measured in T (0.57 ± 0.08 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.