Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340910›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

COVID-19 Persian Misinformation Detection on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods.

Mohammad Javad Shayegan, Elahe Moradi Pirbalouti, Mo Saraee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad Javad ShayeganFaculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering University of Science and Culture Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-2363
Elahe Moradi PirbaloutiFaculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering University of Science and Culture Tehran Iran.
Mo SaraeeSchool of Science, Engineering and Environment University of Salford Salford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-1912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms like Instagram poses a significant threat, eroding public trust and potentially endangering public health. While research in this area has grown considerably, a notable gap remains in addressing misinformation in languages other than English. This study bridges that gap by establishing a comprehensive performance benchmark for detecting misinformation on Instagram, focusing specifically on Persian-language content related to COVID-19. To support this research, we constructed a novel labelled dataset of 27,000 Persian comments collected from Instagram. We employed five established machine learning and deep learning approaches for misinformation analysis: XGBoost (with TF-IDF embedding), LSTM (with GloVe embedding), CNN, KNN and BERT. To prevent overfitting, we conducted model training and validation, evaluating performance using confusion matrices. The results demonstrate that the LSTM model achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 0.97, precision of 0.91, recall of 0.85 and an F1-score of 0.85. This outcome establishes the first high-performance baseline for deep learning methods on this unique Persian misinformation dataset. Furthermore, the training and validation curves for the LSTM approach indicate its effectiveness in mitigating overfitting.

Indexed as

CNNCOVID‐19deep learningLSTMPersian misinformation detection

Identifiers

PMID41340910
PMCPMC12668897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.