ArticleHealthcare technology letters
COVID-19 Persian Misinformation Detection on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COVID-19 Persian Misinformation Detection on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms like Instagram poses a significant threat, eroding public trust and potentially endangering public health. While research in this area has grown considerably, a notable gap remains in addressing misinformation in languages other than English. This study bridges that gap by establishing a comprehensive performance benchmark for detecting misinformation on Instagram, focusing specifically on Persian-language content related to COVID-19. To support this research, we constructed a novel labelled dataset of 27,000 Persian comments collected from Instagram. We employed five established machine learning and deep learning approaches for misinformation analysis: XGBoost (with TF-IDF embedding), LSTM (with GloVe embedding), CNN, KNN and BERT. To prevent overfitting, we conducted model training and validation, evaluating performance using confusion matrices. The results demonstrate that the LSTM model achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 0.97, precision of 0.91, recall of 0.85 and an F1-score of 0.85. This outcome establishes the first high-performance baseline for deep learning methods on this unique Persian misinformation dataset. Furthermore, the training and validation curves for the LSTM approach indicate its effectiveness in mitigating overfitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.