ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Coalition of explainable artificial intelligence and quantum computing in precision medicine.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This survey examines the convergence of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Quantum Computing (QC) toward precision medicine. We review developments from 2018 to 2025, summarizing quantum algorithms, quantum-machine-learning models and XAI techniques applied to drug discovery, disease diagnosis, patient monitoring and biomarker identification. We introduce a taxonomy of hybrid and quantum-explainable approaches, evaluate NISQ hardware and encoding constraints, and compare interpretability methods (SHAP, LIME, QSHAP, QLRP, TSBA). Two case studies (doxorubicin cardiotoxicity prediction and pre-symptomatic IBD flare forecasting) demonstrate hybrid variational-quantum pipelines wrapped with SHAP-based explanations. We identify practical barriers (noise, data encoding, regulation, privacy) and outline research directions to benchmark clinical quantum advantage and develop scalable, transparent QXAI frameworks. The survey aims to guide interdisciplinary efforts toward trustworthy, scalable quantum-enabled precision healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.