Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340887›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Explainable rule-based prediction of cultivation media for microbes.

Petr Máša, Tomáš Kliegr, Marcin P Joachimiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petr MášaPrague University of Economics and Business, Prague 13067, Czech Republic.
Tomáš KliegrPrague University of Economics and Business, Prague 13067, Czech Republic.
Marcin P JoachimiakLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of microbial growth preferences remains dispersed-often confined to research articles or human experts-making new experiment design heavily reliant on manual expertise and literature searches. While previous computational efforts have explored media prediction through phylogenetic similarity or leveraged genomic data for trait modeling, they often produce predictions whose underlying biological rationale is not transparent or rely on biased features (e.g., incomplete genome annotations). To address this need for greater interpretability, we used the recently introduced KG-Microbe knowledge graph, a harmonized resource of microbial organismal traits and other properties, to explain growth media preferences. We employed explainable methods by developing a simple, rule-based classifier from these traits and compared its performance and interpretative power to that of a high-performing black-box model. While the black-box model showed slightly higher overall predictive performance, the transparency of the rule-based system and its ability to generate verifiable, biologically plausible rules make it a more sustainable and insightful framework. To explore feature importance, we applied SHAP to the black-box model and compared the results with a rule-based feature-importance method. Finally, leveraging the resulting rule set-together with insights from a large language model (LLM) and domain expertise-we propose strategies to advance microbial research. Code, models, and results are available at https://github.com/culturebotai/microbe-rules.

Indexed as

CulturomicsExplainable methodsFeature importanceLarge language modelsMicrobial informaticsRule-based classifier

Identifiers

PMID41340887
PMCPMC12670597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.