ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lichenoid Drug Eruption: A 17-Year Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral Lichenoid Reactions Caused by Mesalazine for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to characterize the etiology, clinicopathological features, laboratory findings, management strategies, and clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with lichenoid drug eruption (LDE). Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all biopsy-confirmed LDE cases from January 2008 to October 2024. Data collection included clinical characteristics, causative medications, histopathological as well as laboratory findings, and therapeutic responses. Results: Of the 34 patients, half were male, with a mean age of 65.1 years. LDE most commonly presented as erythematous to violaceous lesions, appearing as patches and plaques, predominantly on the extremities. Histopathology showed lichenoid infiltrates in all cases, with focal infiltration in 58.8%. Parakeratosis was present in 17.7%. Necrotic keratinocytes were found in the basal layer in 82.4% and in the spinous layer in 38.2% of cases. Eosinophilic infiltration was observed in approximately one-third of patients. The most common offending agents were calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (42.5%), followed by statins (25.8%). The median latency period from drug initiation to symptom onset was 10.1 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-45.5). Discontinuation of the causative agent combined with topical corticosteroid therapy resulted in clinical improvement in 73.5% of patients, with a median resolution time of 56 days (IQR 28.0-77.0). Conclusion: Antihypertensive drugs, especially CCBs, were the most frequently implicated triggers of LDE. In addition to lichenoid dermatitis, eosinophilic infiltration served as a key histopathological hallmark of this condition. Timely identification and withdrawal of the causative medication, combined with appropriate treatment, are essential for achieving favorable clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.