ArticleOncology letters2026
Analysis of prognostic factors influencing brain metastasis in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and comparison of prognostic assessment models.
Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling for survival-related outcomes in lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Management of brain metastases in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma are at risk for brain metastasis (BM), which worsens prognosis. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors affecting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations following the development of brain metastases (BM) after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The present study also aimed to evaluate four scoring systems: Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), basic score for BM (BSBM) and lung cancer-associated molecular (Lung-mol) GPA, for their predictive roles. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 260 patients with lung adenocarcinoma with BM and EGFR mutation admitted to the Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine-Hebei Province (Cangzhou, China), from January 2016 to December 2022. The Cox proportional hazard model identified statistically significant prognostic factors. The log-rank test assessed the predictive effect of the four prognostic scoring systems on survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) of each system was calculated. Among the 260 patients analyzed, the median survival time was 28.7 months. Independent prognostic risk factors included a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of <80 [hazard ratio (HR)=2.706; 95% CI, 1.825-4.012; P<0.001], extracranial metastases (HR=2.296; 95% CI, 1.543-3.418; P<0.001) and treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; HR=7.155; 95% CI, 4.950-10.344; P<0.001). All four scoring systems (RPA, DS-GPA, BSBM and Lung-mol GPA) were significant predictors of 1-, 2- and 3-year survival (P<0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the Lung-mol GPA system had the highest AUC, significantly outperforming the other three systems (P<0.05). In conclusion, KPS score, the presence of combined extracranial metastases and the generation of EGFR-TKIs administered are key independent prognostic factors in patients with BM secondary to radical radiotherapy for EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Among the RPA, BSBM, DS-GPA and Lung-mol GPA models, the Lung-mol GPA model demonstrated notably increased predictive accuracy in patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.