ArticleClinical optometry2025
Availability of Eye Care Services and Management Strategies for Ocular Conditions in the uMgungundlovu District, KwaZulu-Natal.
Article in Clinical optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lead Times of Optometry Services in Selected Public Hospitals in Rural South Africa.Clinical optometry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Many ocular conditions that lead to blindness or visual impairment are preventable or treatable with early diagnosis and timely access to eye care. However, individuals in low-income areas often encounter significant barriers. This study assessed eye care management strategies and facility availability for patients in the uMgungundlovu district. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, quantitative, and retrospective study was conducted using an online questionnaire and record card reviews to assess management strategies in selected public eye care facilities in uMgungundlovu from January to December 2022. Cluster sampling across 27 facilities was employed. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), with descriptive statistics presented in graphs and tables. Significant differences in optometrist prescribing patterns were identified, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 1397 record cards were reviewed from seven facilities. Most patients received spectacles (n = 741, 53%), but 12.5% (n = 174) took six months or longer to receive them, and 12% (n = 167) did not receive them at all. Primary facilities occasionally supplied eye drops, requiring referrals to secondary hospitals for ongoing treatment. Statistically significant differences in optometrist prescribing patterns were found for spectacles (p = 0.039) and pharmaceutical treatments (p < 0.001) between primary and secondary care levels. Six out of seven representatives (85.7%) indicated that facilities lacked adequate ophthalmic equipment and qualified professionals. None of the facilities conducted data analysis, resulting in insufficient evidence-based information for planning. Conclusion: The district faces healthcare access and management gaps. With 84% of the population relying on public services, a comprehensive eye care model (CEC) is essential for equitable access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.