Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340860›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Omadacycline versus moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (OPTIC-2): a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, controlled, noninferiority trial.

Thomas M File, Keith S Kaye, Skliarov Ihor, Iryna Hovbakh, Vakhtang Katsarava, Courtney Kirsch, Karan Soni, Kushagra Gupta, Amy Manley, Daniel H Deck and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04779242 (A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Moxifloxacin IV/PO for Treating Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04779242 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Moxifloxacin IV/PO for Treating Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorParatek Pharmaceuticals IncRan2021 to 2024Enrolled670ConditionsCommunity-acquired Pneumonia, Bacterial PneumoniaArmsOmadacycline, Moxifloxacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas M FileSumma Health, Akron, OH, USA.
Keith S KayeRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Skliarov IhorCommunal Non-commercial Enterprise "City Polyclinic No. 9" of the Kharkiv City Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Iryna HovbakhCommunal Non-commercial Enterprise "City Polyclinic No. 9" of the Kharkiv City Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Vakhtang KatsaravaTbilisi State Medical University and Ingorokva State High Technology Medical Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Courtney KirschParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Karan SoniMMS Holdings Canton, MI, USA.
Kushagra GuptaMMS Holdings Canton, MI, USA.
Amy ManleyParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Daniel H DeckParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Diane AnastasiouParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Surya ChitraParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Stephen VillanoParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Omadacycline is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline antibiotic approved to treat adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). This trial was conducted as a postmarketing regulatory commitment to confirm the efficacy and safety of omadacycline. Methods: This phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, noninferiority trial enrolled adults in Eastern Europe between February 2021 (first patient enrolled) and March 2024 (last patient follow-up visit) who had CABP (NCT04779242). Participants with Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) class III or IV CABP were randomised 1:1 to omadacycline (100 mg IV every 12 h for two doses, then 100 mg IV QD) or moxifloxacin (400 mg IV QD), with an oral option after ≥2 days of treatment (omadacycline, 300 mg QD; or moxifloxacin, 400 mg QD), for a total of 7-10 days. Primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response (ECR), assessed 72-120 h after first dose, with a noninferiority margin of 10%. Key secondary endpoint was investigator's assessment of clinical response at post-therapy evaluation (PTE), 5-10 days after last dose. Microbiological response was determined by subject and pathogen. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported through 30-37 days after first dose. Findings: Of 670 participants randomised (omadacycline, n = 336; moxifloxacin, n = 334), approximately half were aged >65 years, and 76% had PSI class III disease. Omadacycline was noninferior to moxifloxacin at ECR and PTE (ECR, 89.6% versus 87.7%, treatment difference [95% CI]: 1.9 [-3.0, 6.8]; PTE, 86.0% versus 87.7%, treatment difference [95% CI]: -1.7 [-6.9, 3.4]). Clinical success rates were consistently high across select pathogens: 74.4-100% for omadacycline, 75.0-97.4% for moxifloxacin. Omadacycline was generally safe and well tolerated. Most commonly reported TEAEs (≥2%) in the omadacycline and moxifloxacin groups, respectively, were headache (3.6%, 4.5%), AST increase (2.1%, 0%), insomnia (0.6%, 2.1%), and diarrhoea (0%, 3.0%). Interpretation: This trial demonstrates the safety and efficacy of omadacycline in CABP. Omadacycline offers a once-daily monotherapy oral and IV option to treat CABP, including in patients with comorbidities. Funding: This study was sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This study described herein has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), under Contract No. 75A50120C00001. The contract and federal funding are not an endorsement of the study results, products, or company.

Indexed as

AminomethylcyclineAntimicrobial resistanceCommunity-acquired pneumoniaPostmarketingTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID41340860
PMCPMC12670926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.