ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2025
Comparing swallowing function in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma after upfront brachytherapy followed by IMRT vs. surgery.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional preservation in oral tongue cancer: Reflections on HyBIRT and surgical management.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: While both surgery and brachytherapy are treatment options for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), the impact of surgery vs. brachytherapy on the swallowing function remains inadequately explored. Therefore, we aimed to analyse the differential impacts of surgery and brachytherapy on swallowing outcomes among OTSCC patients. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 30 histologically confirmed OTSCC patients - 14 in the brachytherapy group (HyBIRT) and 16 in the surgery group (SG) - between June 2022 and October 2023. Patients were enrolled only if imaging confirmed a radiological complete response and they remained disease-free for at least 6 months after treatment. Swallowing was assessed using the Swallowing Capacity Scale (SCS), the Malay Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Malay EAT-10), and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Results: The Swallowing Capacity Scale showed that the patients in the HyBIRT had a superior swallowing capacity, with a mean score of 6.5 compared to the SG (mean score of 4.7). The difference between the two groups was significant ( Conclusions: The organ-preserving HyBIRT technique is a promising alternative for managing OTSCC, particularly in preserving swallowing function, and should be further explored in larger, stratified studies with longer follow-up periods to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.