ReviewTransgender health2025
Barriers of Access to Gender-Affirming Health Care and Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Transgender health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Desire for and Successful Access to Feminizing and Masculinizing Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Cross-Sectional Canada Wide Survey.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Politicization on Adolescent Medicine Care: A Rapid Review.Current pediatrics reports · 2026Review
- Gender-affirming health care needs, barriers to care, and health and wellbeing in a broad nationwide sample of transgender people in Norway.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Top and Bottom Gender Affirming Surgeries Among Eligible Transgender Adults.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Assessment of the care experience during medical transition for transgender and gender diverse people in France: results from the PREMIUM study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Being trans in Korea: key milestones and stigmatization across life stages in a nationwide survey of 585 transgender and non-binary young adults.Epidemiology and health · 2025Article
- Grappling with the complexities of gender transition interruptions: Toward conceptual clarity on "detransitioning" experiences.International journal of transgender health · 2025Review
- Access to transition-related health care among transmasculine people in India: A mixed-methods investigation.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals face significant discrimination and social marginalization that also translate to difficulties in health care accessibility. This review aims to summarize current barriers and identify knowledge gaps in TGNB gender-affirming surgical health care using Penchansky and Thomas's dimensions of access to care. Methods: A systematic review was performed via a search of the Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for English peer-reviewed articles reporting original quantitative and/or qualitative data on or before April 2022. Results: The search retrieved 1046 total articles. Two independent reviewers screened the article titles and abstracts for relevance. Twenty-five articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Most studies were based on patient surveys, while some examined insurance policy coverage. Three major themes emerged as significant barriers to gender-affirming surgical and hormonal care: affordability, accessibility, and racial disparities. Affordability was most often related to inconsistent or inadequate insurance coverage hindering access to care. Geographic accessibility highlighted a lack of proficient providers in gender-affirming surgical and hormonal care in certain areas of the United States and in the suburban and rural settings. Lastly, racial minorities were less likely to access gender-affirming care and may be located in areas where access was limited. Conclusions: While overall access for TGNB patients has improved, considerable barriers remain. Penchansky and Thomas's dimensions of access to care explicate barriers in geographic accessibility to providers and procedures, affordability and insurance coverage, and racial disparities within the TGNB population. Such inequalities demand both medical and public health policy changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.