ReviewActa clinica Croatica2025
DISTAL FEMUR AND PROXIMAL TIBIA MORPHOMETRY AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: 3D CT ANALYSIS IN OA
Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a paucity of data concerning morphological differences in the resected distal femur and proximal tibia between osteoarthritis (OA) and normal knees. The objective of this study was to determine if morphometric differences existed in the resected distal femur and proximal tibia surface between OA and normal knees in the Chinese population. Ninety-eight OA knees and 96 normal ones taken from the Chinese population were measured by computed tomography for femoral mediolateral (fML), medial anteroposterior (fMAP), lateral anteroposterior (fLAP), medial condylar width (fMCW), lateral condylar width (fLCW) and tibial mediolateral (tML), middle anteroposterior (tAP), medial anteroposterior (tMAP), and lateral anteroposterior (tLAP) dimensions to determine morphological differences between OA and normal knees. The mean tMAP and fMCW dimensions were 50.2±3.3 mm and 28.7±2.3 mm for OA, and 48.8±3.8 mm and 27.1±2.2 mm for normal knees, respectively. There were significant differences between OA and normal knees concerning tMAP and fMCW dimensions (p<0.05). The study revealed morphological differences in tMAP and fMCW between the OA and normal knee groups, which may provide guidelines for designing better knee implants that are more size-matching for OA knees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.