ArticleActa clinica Croatica2025
CONTEMPORARY CONCEPTS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUES IN FACIAL REANIMATION: A SCOPING REVIEW.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paralysis of the facial nerve represents an exceptional functional, social and cos- metic problem for the patient. Loss of function directly leads to the inability to protect the eyes, as well as oral competence, while indirectly affecting breathing and verbal communication. Patients often encounter social stigmatization and isolation, which is direct consequence of the loss of mimic function and disfiguration that is necessary for everyday nonverbal communication. Thus, the quality of life is strongly impaired, and patients are prone to developing depression. The primary goal of reanimation is establishment of facial tone at rest, mimic function, and symmetry. The method of choice is directly dependent on the time elapsed from the onset of paralysis. Facial reanimation methods can be divided into static and dynamic. In reanimation procedures, we usually divide the face into thirds. Procedures for reanimation of the upper third of the face include oculoplastic procedures, which are divided according to the place of intervention into procedures aimed at the eyebrow, upper and lower eyelid. Static methods predominate here, i.e., endoscopic eyebrow lifting, tightening of the upper eyelid, and tightening of the lower eyelid. Procedures for reanimation of the lower third of the face are mainly based on restoring oral competence and smile, therefore the method of choice is dynamic reanimation. Direct repair of the nerve either by direct anastomosis or interposition provides the best results. In the absence of the proximal part of the facial nerve, and functional distal branches, local motor nerves and/or cross facial nerve graft (CFNG) are used as a source. In the case of long-term paralysis of the facial nerve (>2 years), muscle tissues are used in reanimation using local or innervated free flaps. Of the local muscle flaps, we most often use the minimally invasive temporalis tendon transfer (MIT3) method. The gracilis free flap is most often used in younger patients who desire to achieve a more accentuated smile, and the procedure can be performed in one or two acts. Reanimation of the face is an often neglected but extremely important procedure that should provide the patient with partial function resumption while significantly improving the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.