ArticleActa clinica Croatica2025
HOW TO REACH 70% RESPONSE RATE IN THE NATIONAL BREAST CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM IN CROATIA?
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A mammography response rate exceeding 70% is one of the parameters for monitoring the success of a national breast cancer screening program (BCS). The aim was to explore the potential for improving the response rate in the BCS in Croatia, based on the accuracy of the invitation database and availability of mammography services. In this cross-sectional study, data from the fifth and sixth implementation cycles were collected through a questionnaire from the BCS county coordinators (N=21). The quality of the invitation database and the number of available mammography appointments were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel. Seventeen percent of women were not available at the address listed in the database and could not be invited for mammography, with variations observed across counties ranging from 31% (Lika-Senj County) to 7% (Krapina-Zagorje County). Only eight counties had a sufficient number of mammography appointments for initial and repeat invitations. With a higher estimate of unavailable women by counties at the end of the fifth cycle, the response rate at the end of the cycle was lower (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.