ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2025
Disappearance of Lateral Spread Response: Reliability as a Prognostic Marker in Hemifacial Spasm.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) using lateral spread response (LSR) has been mostly studied as a tool in optimizing the benefits of microvascular decompression (MVD) in cases of hemifacial spasm (HFS). Although evidence suggests its utility as a prognostic marker, our experience with the same remains otherwise. The significance of the time of disappearance of LSR is also less studied as a factor determining the outcome. This is a pilot study involving a series of patients operated on for HFS using MVD. The prime objectives of the study are: (1) to review LSR in HFS as a prognosticator of outcome and (2) to study the significance of time of disappearance of LSR and its correlation with outcome. Materials and Methods: Patients operated on for HFS with MVD under IONM guidance, between August 2022 and June 2024, were observed in the postoperative period in three phases-immediate, early, and late. The outcomes were divided into-complete, partial or no improvement, and recurrence. The results were studied against the corresponding findings of LSR in those cases. Results: A total of six patients were studied. Of these, three were males and three were females. Intraoperatively, all the patients showed complete loss of LSR after separating the compressing vessel from affected facial nerve. In the immediate postoperative phase, two out of six patients had incomplete improvement in symptoms which later improved in one of the patients in early postoperative phase. The remaining one patient who had partial improvement of symptoms had increased symptoms within 3 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Although LSR monitoring indicates adequate facial nerve decompression, in our experience, LSR disappearance was not congruent with the absence of symptoms in postoperative phase of HFS. The time of disappearance of the LSR waveform intraoperatively has a significant role in determining the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.