ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2025
Scanning Tunneling Microscopy for Molecules: Manipulating Electron Transport through the Conduction Gap by Varying the Buffer Layer.
Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In scanning tunneling microscopy of molecules, an insulating buffer layer is often introduced to reduce interactions between adsorbed molecules and the substrate. We demonstrate that the buffer itself strongly influences the wave function of the tunneling electron at the molecule for tunneling through the molecule's electronic transport gap. We use a theory, which provides a very good agreement with prior experiments on platinum phthalocyanine on a NaCl buffer, to study effects of varying the buffer's composition and thickness and show the importance of the buffer's lattice parameter. Expanding the tunneling electron's wave function using molecular orbitals (MOs) additionally shows how to control the relative weights at the highest occupied MO (HOMO), lowest unoccupied MO (LUMO), and energetically low-lying MOs with few nodal surfaces. Those with significant weight are key for manipulating molecules with tunneling electrons. When used for up-conversion molecular luminescence, in which emitted photons exceed the input tunneling bias, we find that an intricate competition occurs between tunneling through the HOMO or LUMO versus low-lying MOs. The buffer choice provides a substantive handle for controlling such processes. We predict that it can influence the up-conversion efficiency by an order of magnitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.