ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Low iron status and cognitive impairment in northern China community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anemia, iron deficiency, and blood biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: clinical interpretation and dementia risk stratification.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Analysis of potential categories of depression in older adults with chronic illness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The association between serum iron concentration and cognitive ageing remains inconsistent, particularly in rural Chinese populations where both iron deficiency and excess may coexist. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of 737 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years from rural Taiyuan, China, cognitive impairment was assessed with the Chinese-language Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) using education-specific cut-offs. Serum iron was quantified by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and categorized into tertiles (low, medium, high). Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical covariates examined independent and joint associations; restricted cubic splines (RCS) evaluated dose-response patterns. Results: After comprehensive adjustment, serum iron demonstrated a non-linear relationship with cognitive impairment risk. Relative to the lowest tertile, medium (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.95) and high (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.93) serum iron concentrations were associated with reduced odds of cognitive impairment. Spline analysis suggested a U-shaped relationship: risk decreased with rising serum iron up to a nadir and then trended upward; however, the departure from linearity was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: Both low and high serum iron levels are linked to poorer cognitive performance in this rural cohort, supporting the need to maintain iron within an optimal range for healthy cognitive ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.