Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340661›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio as muscle assessment tool and predictive value for mortality and sarcopenia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

Wen-He Zheng, Yan-Ge Hu, Da-Xing Yu, Hui-Bin Huang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wen-He ZhengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Yan-Ge HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Da-Xing YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Hui-Bin HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (CCR) has been developed as a novel biomarker of sarcopenia and prognostic evaluation in various hospitalized populations. However, evidence supporting the use of CCR in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains limited. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether CCR could be a marker of muscle mass for predicting prognosis in patients with CKD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to March 15, 2025. Studies were included if they reported a relationship between CCR and muscle measurements or prognosis in adults with CKD. The risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of exposures tool was used to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Results: Nine studies (seven cohort and two cross-sectional studies) involving 31,673 adults were included. The quality of the included studies ranged from moderate to high. Pooling the results from multifactorial analyses showed that CCR can reliably predict mortality, either using CCR as a category variable [ Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that CCR could serve as a valuable tool for evaluating muscle mass, as well as an indicator of nutritional status and an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with CKD. These findings encourage the use of CCR in this patient population. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0097/, identifier: NPLASY202290097.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasecreatinine-to-cystatin C ratemeta-analysismortalitymuscle mass

Identifiers

PMID41340661
PMCPMC12669093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.