ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2025
Predicability of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells based solely on H&E-stained sections.
Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PD-L1 expression is an important biomarker for selecting patients who are eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, evaluating PD-L1 through immunohistochemistry often faces significant interobserver variability and requires considerable time and resources. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed the field of pathology, leading to more standardized and reproducible methods for biomarker quantification. In this study, we examine the application of AI-driven models, particularly deep learning algorithms, to predict PD-L1 expression directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological slides. Several AI-based approaches have been studied, demonstrating high accuracy in estimating PD-L1 expression and predicting responses to ICIs across various cancer types. AI-driven assessments of PD-L1 have been shown to reduce the subjectivity associated with manual scoring methods, such as the Tumor Proportion Score and the Combined Positive Score. Moreover, integrating AI with multimodal data, including genomics, radiomics, and real-world clinical data, can further enhance predictive accuracy and improve patient stratification for immunotherapy. Finally, AI-driven computational pathology offers a transformative approach to biomarker evaluation, providing a faster, more objective, and cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, with significant implications for personalized oncology and precision medicine. Despite these promising results, several challenges remain to be addressed, such as the need for large-scale validation, standardization of AI models, and regulatory approvals for clinical implementation. Tackling these issues will be crucial for incorporating AI-based PD-L1 assessments into routine pathology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.