ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
[Between Guidelines and Gases: A Multicenter Evaluation of the Methodology, Diagnostic Accuracy and Quality of Hydrogen and Methane Breath Tests in Argentina].
Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The breath test is currently the most widely used tool for diagnosing small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. The rising prevalence of this condition has led to increased test utilization. However, concerns remain regarding its im plementation, including adherence to international guidelines related to methodology, diagnostic interpretation, and report quality. Aim: To assess the methodology, report quality, and diagnostic accuracy of breath tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Argentina, based on international guidelines. Material and methods: A multicenter observational study included 210 breath test reports from 8 centers across differ ent geographic regions of Argentina. The methodology used for test performance and report quality was evaluated based on 13 predefined criteria. Additionally, the concordance between the diagnoses reported by centers and those determined by an expert based on international guidelines was analyzed. Results: Significant heterogeneity in methodology and low ad herence to international guidelines were observed. Among the studies, 89% measured only H Conclusions: This study underscores the need to standardize breath test methodology and enhance adherence to international guidelines. Efforts should focus on improving report quality, unifying methodology, and increasing diagnostic accuracy for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Argentina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.