ArticleAccounts of materials research2025
Regulating Light Absorption, Charge Orientation, and Oxygen Activation of Conjugated Porous Polymers for Photocatalytic Organic Synthesis.
Article in Accounts of materials research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thiophene-Sulfone-Based D-A Conjugated Porous Polymers: Acceptor Regulation for Efficient Blue Light-Driven Selective Aerobic Oxidation of Sulfides and Amines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conjugated porous polymers (CPPs), featuring π-conjugation systems, freedom in molecular structural design, and intrinsic porosity, have emerged as a modular platform for visible-light-driven organic synthesis. At present, their photocatalytic efficiency is limited by incomplete absorption of visible light, inefficient charge separation, and inadequate management of oxygen-active species, urging the field to explore solutions. Light absorption can be strengthened by molecular engineering strategies, e.g., extension of π-conjugation, adjustment of donor-acceptor units, and incorporation of chromophores, e.g., triazine and phenothiazine, that redshift and thus broaden the absorption. Charge separation can intensify by integration of donor-acceptor segments and π-bridged linkers to cut exciton binding energy and extend lifetime of carriers; migration of charge carriers can be more directed by introduction of polar substituents and localized dipoles. Along with modifying the bandgap structure, modulation of the catalytic microenvironment can shape selective substrate activation, for instance, framework rigidification, control of electronic structure of active sites, and spatial confinement of intermediates. In terms of handling oxygen-active species, we can regulate charge distribution and electronic structure within the conjugated backbone. This regulation enhances formation of reactive intermediates such as superoxide, hydroxyl radical, and other essential oxygen-derived species to drive oxidative photocatalytic processes. Together, these approaches establish a coherent design scheme to develop high-performance, metal-free photocatalysts for diverse organic synthesis and sets a foundation for future sustainable catalysis and synthesis of photoresponsive materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.