ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Integrative deep learning analysis of 2D and 3D body composition features for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after radical distal pancreatectomy (DP) is critical for optimizing surgical strategies. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a deep learning-based framework for three-dimensional (3D) body composition analysis to forecast POPF in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent radical DP at two institutions between 2015 and 2022. A deep learning-based 2D and 3D segmentation model was developed to assess abdominal muscles and fat using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. Predictive models for POPF were constructed using Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT) and their performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) on validation and external test datasets.
resultsThe study comprised 230 patients with PC, with a mean age of 62 years. The incidence of POPF was observed to be 47.4% (Grade B/C). In terms of muscle segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) for the testing set varied between 91.84 and 98.41% across different regions of the abdominal musculature. For the segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, the DSCs in the testing set were 97.10 and 98.57%, respectively. The integrated clinical and imaging-based POPF prediction model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.82, with a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.76 in the external test set.
conclusionThe implementation of a deep learning-based 2D and 3D body composition analysis pipeline exhibited high accuracy in predicting POPF following radical DP for PC. However, further validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is required to confirm the generalizability of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.