ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Listening to the note: clinician perspectives on ambient artificial intelligence scribes in medical documentation.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence on artificial intelligence-assisted clinical documentation and healthcare workers' emotional wellbeing at work: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging the trust-adoption gap for AI scribes in rural communities: A machine learning approach using the 2024 Canadian digital health survey.International journal of medical informatics · 2026Article
- Hospital Human Resource Managers' Perspectives on Organizational Readiness for Generative AI Skills: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Physician burnout in rheumatology: are medical scribes part of the solution?Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Socio-Technical Mechanisms Shaping AI Scribe Documentation Failures: A Netnographic Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Clinician Burnout in the United States: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Clinicians' rationale for editing ambient AI-drafted clinical notes: persistent challenges and implications for improvement.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- From Clinical Encounter to Draft Documentation: A Mechanistic Narrative Review of Ambient Scribe Technology.Cureus · 2026Review
- Review
- Implementation of Ambient AI Scribes in Hospitals: Lessons for Healthcare Leadership, Governance, and Change Management.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo qualitatively characterize barriers and facilitators to implementing and using an ambient scribe across a large academic medical center, as well as how ambient transcription reshapes clinicians' perceptions of their work. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians who participated in an ambient scribe pilot (n = 8) and the initial enterprise rollout (n = 16). We sought heterogeneity by specialty, note volume, burnout, and prior time-in-notes. Interviews (26-60 min) were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a naturalistic, ethnographic approach informed by broad implementation considerations, and an analytic lens treating note sections as documentation "genres."
resultsClinicians described feeling more present with patients and greater satisfaction during visits. Fictions included overlong or underspecified sections (eg, History of Present Illness vs Assessment & Plan), unfamiliar formatting, and a perceived loss of "voice." Participants discussed how they used documentation to personalize practice, demonstrate expertise, manage impressions with colleagues and supervisors, and communicate sensitive findings-activities not fully captured by efficiency metrics. Inpatient and procedure-heavy contexts reported limited benefit where documentation was already highly standardized. DISCUSSION: Early ambient scribe implementation produced recognizable benefits, but introduced new work to reconcile AI-drafted text with local documentation genres and audience-specific communication. Tailored prompts, onboarding, and peer support may reduce the need to revise artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text.
conclusionAmbient scribe adoption can enhance patient interactions and perceived efficiency while reshaping how clinicians express voice and expertise in notes. Implementation strategies attentive to documentation genre and audience may help align ambient scribe outputs with clinical communication needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.