Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340524›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

Listening to the note: clinician perspectives on ambient artificial intelligence scribes in medical documentation.

Jen Van Tiem, Elizabeth Cramer, Christopher Iverson, Korey Kennelty, Noah Andrys, Julie Lee, Lindsey Knake, Jason Misurac, James Blum, Heather Schacht Reisinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jen Van TiemDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-9909
Elizabeth CramerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Christopher IversonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Korey KenneltyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Noah AndrysCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Julie LeeDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Lindsey KnakeStead Family Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Jason MisuracStead Family Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
James BlumDepartment of Anesthesia, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Heather Schacht ReisingerImplementation Science Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.

Funding

Department Executive Officer of Family and Community MedicineDepartment Executive Officer of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Iowa Carver College of MedicineHigh Impact Hiring InitiativeUniversity of Iowa Carver College of MedicineUniversity of Iowa's Year 2 P3 Strategic Initiatives Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo qualitatively characterize barriers and facilitators to implementing and using an ambient scribe across a large academic medical center, as well as how ambient transcription reshapes clinicians' perceptions of their work. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians who participated in an ambient scribe pilot (n = 8) and the initial enterprise rollout (n = 16). We sought heterogeneity by specialty, note volume, burnout, and prior time-in-notes. Interviews (26-60 min) were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a naturalistic, ethnographic approach informed by broad implementation considerations, and an analytic lens treating note sections as documentation "genres."

resultsClinicians described feeling more present with patients and greater satisfaction during visits. Fictions included overlong or underspecified sections (eg, History of Present Illness vs Assessment & Plan), unfamiliar formatting, and a perceived loss of "voice." Participants discussed how they used documentation to personalize practice, demonstrate expertise, manage impressions with colleagues and supervisors, and communicate sensitive findings-activities not fully captured by efficiency metrics. Inpatient and procedure-heavy contexts reported limited benefit where documentation was already highly standardized. DISCUSSION: Early ambient scribe implementation produced recognizable benefits, but introduced new work to reconcile AI-drafted text with local documentation genres and audience-specific communication. Tailored prompts, onboarding, and peer support may reduce the need to revise artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text.

conclusionAmbient scribe adoption can enhance patient interactions and perceived efficiency while reshaping how clinicians express voice and expertise in notes. Implementation strategies attentive to documentation genre and audience may help align ambient scribe outputs with clinical communication needs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsAcademic Medical CentersHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchambient scribeevaluationgenerative artificial intelligenceimplementationqualitative

Identifiers

PMID41340524
PMCPMC12844589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.