SynthesisAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Clinical Use of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Bone Defects and Infected Bone: A Systematic Review of the Quality of Clinical Outcomes and A Grade Assessment.
Synthesis in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Use of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Bone Defects and Infected Bone: A Systematic Review of the Quality of Clinical Outcomes and A Grade Assessment.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Pooled it
- Pitaya‑inspired compartmentalized microspheres with natural tannic acid-copper coating orchestrate smart release of ions and multi-drugs for synergistic treatment of infected bone defects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Hydrogel-Based Immunomodulatory Strategies for Infected Bone Defects Regeneration: Remodeling the Osteoimmune Microenvironment and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioactive glass (BAG) S53P4 is a synthetic bone substitute consisting of oxides of silicon, sodium, calcium and phosphorus and exhibits both osteoconductive and antibacterial properties. Clinically it has been used in the treatment of benign bone tumor surgery, in spine surgery, in trauma surgery, in frontal sinus surgery, in diabetic foot osteomyelitis surgery, in mastoid surgery, in oral and maxillofacial surgery, and in the treatment of bone infections with excellent clinical outcomes. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines is performed to evaluate the level of evidence, clinical efficacy, and safety of BAG S53P4 as a bone graft substitute in the treatment of bone defects and infected bone. Clinical studies published between 1990 until 2024 are extracted and analyzed (N = 99). The highest level of clinical evidence (L1-L2) of successful use of BAG S53P4 is found in the treatment of benign bone tumor surgery (N = 5), in oral and maxillofacial surgery (N = 5), in the treatment of bone infection (N = 6), in spinal surgery (N = 3), and in trauma surgery (N = 3). The highest evidence on successful treatment in respect to the number of publications on BAG S53P4 are found in the categories of infection treatment (N = 24) and in mastoid surgery (N = 30). Derived from this systematic literature review and level of evidence assessment, BAG S53P4 is a safe and effective alternative to autograft bone and offers excellent long-term outcomes in various clinical indications when bone grafts are needed. In the management of osteomyelitis in infected non-unions, mastoid surgery and diabetic foot, BAG S53P4 demonstrates high infection eradication rates and successful bone healing. Considering the increasing incidence of microbial resistance to antibiotics its role may become critical in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.